JGSOC Batangas plant operates in a city-designated heavy industrial zone along Batangas Bay, along with several other industries such as the Batangas port, tank farms and depots, several power plants, food manufacturing facilities, and other similar companies.
Annexes
Annex A. Economic, Environment, Social, and Governance (EESG) Performance Indices
Economic Performance
Direct Economic Value Generated and Distributed (in Million PHP)
Disclosure | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(per 17A) | (including RBank) | (per 17A) | (including RBank) | (per 17A) | (including URC China) | |
Direct economic value generated (revenue) | 303,614 | 314,116 | 345,919 | 358,865 | 380,460 | 380,699 |
Direct economic value distributed | 308,725 | 317,009 | 324,319 | 336,200 | 363,161 | 363,449 |
Payment to employees (Employee wages and benefits) |
27,558 | 29,672 | 32,671 | 35,051 | 34,237 | 34,295 |
Payments to suppliers, other operating costs |
252,619 | 257,795 | 259,035 | 267,219 | 290,814 | 291,043 |
Payment to Providers of Capital |
19,811 | 19,811 | 24,590 | 24,590 | 29,507 | 29,507 |
Payment to Government |
8,726 | 9,718 | 8,015 | 9,331 | 8,584 | 8,585 |
Community Investments Donations & Distributions |
11 | 12 | 8 | 8 | 19 | 19 |
Direct Economic Value Retained | (5,111) | (2,893) | 21,600 | 22,665 | 17,299 | 17,250 |
Note
- The amounts reflected herein are taken from the Company’s audited financial statements for the year. Certain items in direct economic value distributed such as dividends given to stockholders are sourced from the previous year’s economic value generated based on the SEC guidelines and found in the Company’s balance sheet accounts. All other items are taken from the Company’s financial statement. Hence, economic value distributed can be greater than economic value generated.
- Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS) 5, Noncurrent Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, requires income and expenses from disposal groups to be presented separately from continuing operations, down to the level of profit after taxes. In June 2024, several China entities ceased operations and abandoned their business activities. The resulting profit or loss (after taxes) is reported separately in the consolidated statements of income. Accordingly, the consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2024 is presented as ‘Net Income or Loss After Tax from Discontinued Operations’.
For purposes of the sustainability report, references should be made to the total JG consolidated balances including China Operations.
Procurement Practices
Proportion of Spending on Local Suppliers
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of procurement budget used for significant locations of operations that is spent on local suppliers2 |
% | 61 (URC) | 55 (URC) | 65 (URC)3 |
15 (JGSOC) | 11 (JGSOC) | 10 (JGSOC) | ||
62 (CEB) | 62 (CEB) | 52 (CEB) |
JGSHI is still in the process of consolidating this data from all subsidiaries.
URC data covers BCF-PH and BCF-INT which composed of direct materials (raw material and packaging material) only.
Environmental Performance
Energy Consumption Within the Organization
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2023 (Restatement)* | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Energy Consumption | GJ | 29,658,971 | 36,907,400 | 37,089,446 | 40,724,095 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Total Renewable Energy Consumption | GJ | 1,668,296 | 2,086,356 | 2,276,972 | 2,018,030 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC |
Renewable Energy Generated (Solar and Biomass)5 |
GJ | 822,408 | 1,064,918 | 1,253,714 | 1,055,991 | URC, RLC, JGSOC |
Renewable Energy from the Grid6 |
GJ | 845,888 | 1,020,215 | 1,022,036 | 961,906 | URC, RLC |
Sustainable Aviation Fuel-SAF |
GJ | - | 1,222 | 133 | CEB | |
Total Non-renewable Energy Consumption7 | GJ | 27,990,674 | 34,821,044 | 34,821,474 | 38,706,065 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Gasoline |
GJ | 28,753 | 39,542 | 37,960 | 25,839 | |
LPG |
GJ | 680,856 | 668,311 | 883,365 | URC, RLC, JGSOC | |
Diesel |
GJ | 751,290 | 632,908 | 782,947 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU | |
Bunker |
GJ | 4,286,595 | 3,260,924 | 3,164,014 | URC, JGSOC | |
Coal |
GJ | 2,839,396 | 2,876,263 | 2,876,271 | 2,633,400 | URC |
CNG |
GJ | 385,683 | 356,211 | 395,842 | ||
LNG |
GJ | 106,268 | 169,254 | 161,009 | 150,118 | |
Jet fuel |
GJ | 15,700,919 | 23,670,702 | 26,846,018 | CEB | |
Grid Electricity |
GJ | 3,210,914 | 3,146,930 | 3,148,178 | 3,824,522 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
*Restatement of 2023 numbers to reflect exclusion of URC China operations, recalculations of carbon emission of PH grid electricity using Department of Energy’s new released emission factors and migration to Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), URC and RLC’s correction of data errors, and inclusions of late utility billings by CEB. Total energy consumption is 0.49% higher compared to previously disclosed 2023 figures.
Data covers information of total URC (BCF-PH, Flour, SURE, AIG, head offices, and external distribution centers in the Philippines, BCF-INT excl. China)
Data includes on-site generation of solar power, biomass and biogas utilization
Purchased electricity from renewable sources through Retail Electricity Contracts
Includes fossil fuel used from operations and company-owned vehicles
Energy Intensity
Disclosure | Unit | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
Energy Intensity | GJ/MPHP | 107.04 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
GHG Emissions
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2023 (Restatement)* | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total GHG Emissions | tCO2e | 2,615,183 | 2,585,360 | 2,028,257 | 3,774,6189 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Gross Direct (Scope 1) GHG Emissions |
tCO2e | 2,114,530 | 2,171,880 | 1,602,983 | 1,742,175 | |
Gross Energy Indirect (Scope 2) GHG Emissions10 |
tCO2e | 391,600 | 302,488 | 314,283 | 368,077 | |
Gross Other Indirect (Scope 3) GHG Emissions |
tCO2e | 109,053 | 110,991 | 1,664,366 | RLC, CEB, JGSOC | |
GHG emissions intensity | tCO2e/MPHP | 8.32 | 7.20 | 5.65 | 9.92 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
ODS | tonnes | 23.48 | 24.39 | 0.51 | RLC11 |
*Restatement of 2023 numbers to reflect exclusion of URC China operations, recalculations of carbon emission of PH grid electricity using Department of Energy’s new released emission factors and migration to Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), correction of data errors, and inclusions of late utility billings by CEB. Total GHG emissions are 21.55% lower than the emissions previously reported for 2023. Similarly, GHG intensity is 21.53% lower.
URC’s GHG emissions cover information of total URC (BCF-PH, Flour, SURE, AIG, head offices, and external distribution centers in the Philippines, BCF-INT excl. China). This includes fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions include emissions from refrigerants consumed by the plants which include R22 / Freon, R134a, R404, R407, R410, R507, R141B, R417, R32.
The increase in total GHG emissions in 2024 is primarily due to the inclusion of Scope 3 data from CEB and JGSOC, which were reported for the first time.
Scope 2 emissions from renewable energy sourced from the grid were calculated using the market-based approach, applying emission factors provided by Retail Electricity Suppliers.
RLC’s data refers to ODS produced from generator sets.
Air Pollutants
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) | tonnes | 1,438.93 | 2,019.41 | 2,037.09 | URC, RLC, CEB |
Sulfur Oxides (SOx) | tonnes | 418.54 | 272.98 | 282.65 | |
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POP) | tonnes | - | - | - | No available data |
Volatile Organic Pollutants (VOC) | tonnes | - | - | 3.38 | RLC |
Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) | tonnes | - | - | - | No available data |
Particulate Matter (PM) | tonnes | 365.65 | 158.63 | 180.46 | URC, RLC |
Note
- All stationary, mobile, and vehicular equipment of JGSHI subsidiaries undergo mandatory emission testing as required by DENR and the Land Transportation Office (LTO).
- URC data covers information from air pollution source equipment (APSE), such as boilers, generator sets, ovens, and chimneys of URC, with air emission test results in 2024 conducted by a DENR Accredited Laboratory (PH operations).
- Per National Emission Standards for Source-Specific Air Pollutants, all the emission test results in PH operations (expressed in mg/Nm3) were within the standards set by the DENR-EMB.
URC’s scope of disclosure for 2024 has expanded to include BCF-International, AIG, FLOUR, and SURE business units.
Water Consumption Within the Organization
Total Water Withdrawal from All Areas by Source
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2023 (Restatement)* | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries13 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Water Withdrawal | m3 | 26,534,593 | 26,158,218 | 26,688,045 | 24,720,675 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Third-Party Water |
m3 | 8,295,525 | 8,489,120 | 9,018,208 | 9,622,273 | |
Ground Water |
m3 | 10,719,582 | 10,629,357 | 10,630,096 | 9,578,879 | URC, RLC, JGSOC |
Surface Water |
m3 | 4,974,552 | 5,426,496 | 3,337,008 | URC | |
Sea Water |
m3 | 2,544,934 | 1,613,245 | 2,182,515 | JGSOC | |
Water Discharge | m3 | 7,578,379 | 9,113,680 | 9,144,241 | 9,408,530 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC |
Water Consumption | m3 | 18,956,215 | 17,044,537 | 17,543,804 | 15,312,144 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Water Intensity | m3/MPHP | - | 72.89 | 74.37 | 64.89 | |
Water recycled and reused14 | m3 | 1,084,659 | 1,207,273 | 1,205,102 | 1,030,707 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC |
% of wastewater recycled | % | 14.32 | 13.28 | 13.21 | 10.96 |
*Restatement of 2023 numbers to reflect exclusion of URC China operations and RLC’s correction of data errors. Total water withdrawal is 2.03% higher compared to previously disclosed 2023 figures. Similarly, water intensity is 2% higher.
Data covers information of total URC (BCF-PH, Flour, SURE, AIG, and BCF-INT excl. China).
Water recycled and re-used is the volume of water from wastewater and rainwater recovery.
Materials Used by Weight or Volume
Material Used by the Organization
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2023 (Restatement)* | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries15 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Renewable Materials | tonnes | 1,981,157 | 1,113,691 | 6,834,127 | 5,589,427 | URC16 |
Non-renewable Materials17 | tonnes | 767,659 | 693,298 | 730,444 | 805,662 | URC, RLC18, JGSOC |
Percentage of recycled input materials used to manufacture the organization's primary products and services19 | % | 3.0 | 6.87 | 0.58 | 0.61 | URC |
*Restatement of 2023 numbers to reflect exclusion of URC China operations and an updated URC’s data boundary which now covers all available raw and packaging materials used by the organization. Renewable materials are 514% higher compared to previously disclosed 2023 figures. Similarly, non-renewable materials increased by 5%.
Data covers information of total URC (BCF-PH, Flour, SURE, AIG, and BCF-INT excl. China).
URC’s renewable material pertains to raw materials of agricultural origin and cartons for packaging.
Includes, but not limited to, construction materials such as cement, concrete, glass, and rebars from RLC, as well as URC's re-grind PET bottles reused to mix with virgin resin for bottle making of BCF-PH
RLC data includes only materials used for repairs and renovations of existing properties, not materials used for the construction of new buildings. RLC aims to improve data collection for materials to facilitate comparison and analysis in the future. RLC aims to report data on construction materials for all business segments starting 2025.
Percentage of recycled input materials is computed as the amount of re-grind PET used as feedstock divided by the total input for packaging materials. Scope includes URC BCFG-PH
Waste Generation
Solid Waste and Hazardous Waste
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2023 (Restatement)* | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total solid waste generated | tonnes | 2,977,125 | 2,495,844 | 2,495,571 | 1,768,388 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC |
Reusable |
tonnes | 120 | 2,950 | 2,641 | RLC | |
Recyclable |
tonnes | 952,316 | 627,758 | 627,757 | 369,884 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC |
Composted/Bio |
tonnes | 8,367 | 5,170 | 5,663 | RLC, CEB, JGSOC | |
Residual |
tonnes | 35,196 | 46,020 | 45,748 | 41,307 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC |
Renewables |
tonnes | 1,981,125 | 1,813,946 | 1,348,892 | URC, CEB | |
Solid Waste Intensity | tonnes/MPhp | - | 6.95 | 4.65 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC | |
Total weight of hazardous waste generated | tonnes | 2,683 | 1,797 | 1,990 | URC, RLC20, JGSOC | |
Total weight of hazardous waste transported | tonnes | 2,477 | 1,468 | 1,690 |
Note: Discrepancy from hazardous waste generated and transported are stored in the DENR -prescribed Hazwaste onsite storage waiting for schedule of transport and treatment.
*Restatement of 2023 numbers to reflect exclusion of URC China operations. The total solid waste generated decreased by 0.01% compared to the previously disclosed 2023 figures.
RLC already transported all remaining hazardous waste from 2024 in Q1 2025 to DENR-accredited treatment facilities.
Non-compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations
Disclosure | Unit | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
Total amount of monetary fines for noncompliance with environmental laws and/or regulations | PHP | 0 | JGSHI-CCU |
No. of non-monetary sanctions for noncompliance with environmental laws and/or regulations | # | 0 | |
No. of cases resolved through dispute resolution mechanism | # | 0 |
Social
Employee Data
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Employees | # | 23,122 | 24,298 | 23,653 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Males |
# | 13,597 | 14,227 | 14,227 | |
Females |
# | 9,525 | 10,071 | 9,426 | |
Attrition Rate | % | 7.5821 | 3.27 | 1.5522 | |
10.523 | |||||
Ratio of lowest paid employee against minimum wage | Ratio | 1:1 | 1:1 | 1:124 |
Attrition rate of CCU, RBank, CEB, RLC, JGSOC
Attrition rate is calculated using SEC formula: Attrition rate = (No. of new hires – No. of turnover)/ (Average of total no. of employees of previous and current year)
Attrition rate of URC
The ratio is based on the comparison between the wage of the lowest paid employee (base fare) and the minimum wage on the specific region. JGSHI is compliant with the minimum wage requirement.
Employees by Age Group
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 years old and below | # | 2,108 | 4,462 | 5,614 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
27-41 years old | # | 5,880 | 13,598 | 12,716 | |
42–56 years old | # | 1,737 | 5,584 | 4,923 | |
57 years old and up | # | 224 | 654 | 400 |
Employees by Contract Type
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regular | # | 7,926 | 21,248 | 20,748 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Consultant, FTE, and Project-Based | # | 154 | 1,188 | 981 | |
Probationary | # | 1,869 | 1,862 | 1,924 |
Employees by Length of Tenure
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
<1 years<="" td=""> | # | 3,301 | 4,275 | 3,477 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
1>
1-3 years | # | 1,550 | 5,519 | 7,311 | |
3-5 years | # | 1,306 | 2,793 | 2,186 | |
5-7 years | # | 1,151 | 2,720 | 1,948 | |
7+ years | # | 2,641 | 8,991 | 8,731 |
Employees by Rank
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Executives/Senior Management | # | 398 | 439 | 264 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | 217 | 248 | 156 | JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Female |
# | 181 | 191 | 108 | |
Rank-and-File | # | 4,583 | 12,750 | 13,050 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | - | - | 322 | JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Female |
# | - | - | 205 | |
Supervisor | # | 1,368 | 3,352 | 3,117 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | - | - | 109 | JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Female |
# | - | - | 61 | |
Manager | # | 2,649 | 3,969 | 3,420 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | - | - | 152 | JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Female |
# | - | - | 127 | |
Seasonal | # | 5 | 378 | 368 | URC |
Male |
# | - | |||
Female |
# | - | |||
Professional/Technical | # | 946 | 3,410 | 3,434 | URC, RLC, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | 279 | JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU | ||
Female |
# | 195 |
Employees by Place of Origin
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local | 9,884 | 18,875 | 9,631 | RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
|
National Capital Region |
# | 6,334 | 5,346 | 3,840 | |
Luzon (outside NCR) |
# | 2,234 | 3,585 | 3,806 | |
Visayas |
# | 993 | 1,561 | 1,485 | |
Mindanao |
# | 323 | 582 | 500 | |
International | 65 | 5,423 | 70 | ||
Africa |
# | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
America |
# | 2 | 2 | 1 | |
Asia |
# | 58 | 5,416 | 65 | |
Australia |
# | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Europe |
# | 5 | 5 | 4 |
New Hires for Permanent Employees
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Employee Hires | # | 3,652 | 4,602 | 3,735 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | 1,617 | 2,035 | 2,046 | |
Female |
# | 2,035 | 2,567 | 1,689 |
New Hires by Age Group
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 years old and below | # | 1,460 | 2,003 | 2,057 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
27-41 years old | # | 1,897 | 2,139 | 1,384 | |
42-56 years old | # | 281 | 395 | 248 | |
57 years old and up | # | 14 | 65 | 46 |
New Hires by Contract Type
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permanent or indefinite | # | 3,474 | 4,042 | 3,461 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Temporary or fixed-term | # | 178 | 560 | 274 |
New Hires by Place of Origin
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Local | # | 3,647 | 4,026 | 2,185 | RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
National Capital Region |
# | 2,410 | 2,345 | 741 | |
Luzon (outside NCR) |
# | 600 | 986 | 864 | |
Visayas |
# | 540 | 533 | 451 | |
Mindanao |
# | 97 | 162 | 129 | |
International | # | 5 | 660 | 6 | |
Africa |
# | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
America |
# | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
Asia |
# | 5 | 651 | 6 | |
Australia |
# | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
Europe |
# | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Turnover for Permanent Employees
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Employee Turnover | # | 1,979 | 3,826 | 3,364 | URC25, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
# | 873 | 1,689 | 1,618 | |
Female |
# | 1,106 | 1,500 | 1,272 |
URC's breakdown of turnover by gender pertains solely to voluntary departures.
Employee Turnover by Age Group
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 years old and below | # | 445 | 846 | 866 | URC26, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
27-41 years old | # | 1,328 | 1,920 | 1,599 | |
42-56 years old | # | 157 | 327 | 348 | |
57 years old and up | # | 49 | 96 | 77 |
URC's breakdown of turnover by age pertains solely to voluntary departures.
Employee Turnover by Rank
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Executives/Senior Management | # | 48 | 41 | 22 | URC27, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Middle managers and supervisors | # | 671 | 1,009 | 783 | |
Rank-and-file permanent | # | 1,051 | 1,497 | 1,434 | |
Professional/Technical | # | 209 | 642 | 640 |
URC's breakdown of turnover by rank pertains solely to voluntary departures.
Employee Turnover by Type
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Voluntary | # | 1,852 | 2,887 | 2,543 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Involuntary | # | 126 | 939 | 821 |
Diversity and Equal Opportunity
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent of male workers in the workforce | % | 59 | 59 | 60 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Percent of female workers in the workforce | % | 41 | 41 | 40 | |
Number of employees from indigenous communities and/or vulnerable sector28 | # | 30 | 0 | - |
Vulnerable sector includes, elderly, persons with disabilities, vulnerable women, refugees, migrants, internally displaced persons, people living with HIV and other diseases, solo parents, and the poor or the base of the pyramid (BOP; Class D and E). This metric is currently not tracked by the group.
Employee Benefits
JGS and its subsidiaries provide all mandatory benefits to 100% of its regular employees. Listed below are these mandatory requirements as well as some additional benefits that JGSHI and its subsidiaries offer its employees:
List of Benefits29 | Y/N | % of male employees who availed for the year |
% of female employees who availed for the year |
Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSS
|
Y | 14.47% 0% 1.57% |
12.76% 0% 1.64% |
URC30, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
PhilHealth | Y | 1.29% | 3.20% | |
Pag-ibig Salary loan | Y | 13.92% | 6.03% | |
Parental leaves | Y | 0.40% | 1.01% | |
Vacation leaves | Y | 33.63% | 35.13% | |
Sick leaves | Y | 31.76% | 33.67% | |
Emergency leaves | Y | 3.62% | 2.95% | |
Medical benefits (aside from PhilHealth): HMO | Y | 100% covered | 100% covered | |
Housing assistance (aside from Pag-ibig) | Y | 3.13% | 5.37% | |
Retirement fund (aside from SSS) | Y | 12.17% | 6.68% | |
Further education support | Y | 0.40% | 0.83% | |
Company stock options | Y | 0% | 0% | |
Telecommuting | Y | 12.88% | 8.38% | |
Flexible-working Hours | Y | 1.80% | 4.63% | |
Others
|
Y | 100% | 100% | This covers JGSHI CCU employees only. Benefits not mandated by the government are specifically allocated by the business units based on what is most suitable to their industry and their employees’ needs. While JGSHI ensures that 100% of eligible employees are given government-mandated and company benefits. |
Benefits not mandated by the government are specifically allocated by the business units based on what is most suitable to their industry and their employees’ needs. While JGSHI ensures that 100% of eligible employees are given government-mandated and company benefits.
URC data covers employees working in the head office.
Employee Training and Development
Training Hours Provided to Employees
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total training hours provided to employees | hours | 391,377 | 476,652 | 566,887 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Male |
hours | 71,576 | 80,649 | 204,265 | |
Female |
hours | 78,082 | 38,296 | 362,622 | |
Average training hours per employee | hours/employee | 16.93 | 21.34 | 23.97 | |
Male |
hours/employee | 15.42 | 18.10 | 14.36 | |
Female |
hours/employee | 14.71 | 8.14 | 38.47 |
Labor Management Relations
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of employees covered with Collective Bargaining Agreements | % | 11.03 | 20.15 | 19.87 | URC, CEB |
Number of consultations conducted with employees concerning employee-related policies | # | 16 | 5 | 204 | URC, RLC, CEB |
Labor Laws and Human Rights
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of legal actions or employee grievances involving forced or child labor | # | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Do you have policies that explicitly disallows violations of labor laws and human rights (e.g. harassment, bullying) in the workplace?
Topic | Y/N | If Yes, cite reference in the company policy |
---|---|---|
Forced labor | Y | The Company adopts and complies with the rules and regulations issued by the Department of Labor and Employment. Moreover, the Company ensures that engaged Service Providers comply with the same. |
Child labor | Y | The Company adopts and complies with the rules and regulations issued by the Department of Labor and Employment. Moreover, the Company ensures that engaged Service Providers comply with the same. |
Human Rights | Y |
|
Occupational Health and Safety
Disclosure | Unit | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Safe Man-Hours | hours | 93,248,790 | 108,227,225.93 | 119,277,735 |
Number of safety drills conducted | # | 272 | 446 | 386 |
Number of work-related injuries | # | 341 | 149 | 272 |
Number of work-related fatalities | # | 4 | 4 | 1 |
Number of work-related ill-health | # | 0 | 3 | 0 |
Number of Lost Time Incidents (LTI) | # | 66 | 49 | 69 |
Number of Days lost due to LTI | # | 27,386 | 191 | 8,781 |
Number of First Aid Incidents | # | 219 | 74 | 139 |
Number of Medical Treatment Incidents | # | 61 | 27 | 87 |
All Injury Frequency Rate (AIFR) | rate | 4.15 | 0.32 | 4.82 |
Governance
Anti-corruption
Training on Anti-corruption Policies and Procedures
Disclosure | Unit | Value | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
Percentage of employees to whom the organization's anti-corruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | % | 100 | This total accounts for employees in JGSHI to whom the Code of Business Conduct have been communicated to |
Percentage of business partners to whom the organization’s anticorruption policies and procedures have been communicated to | % | 100 | This total accounts for suppliers in JGSHI to whom the Code of Business Conduct, the Code of Discipline, and related Offenses Subject to Disciplinary Actions (OSDA) have been communicated to during the onboarding and orientation processes only. Primarily, such offenses are covered by the Dos and Don'ts in transacting and doing business with the business. |
Number of directors and management that have received anti-corruption training | % | 100 | The JGSHI Board of Directors and Officers31 attended the in-house SEC-accredited Corporate Governance Training entitled “Building a Resilient Gokongwei Group: Corporate Governance Training on Sustainability, Cybersecurity, and Integrity” on September 10, 202432 |
Percentage of employees that have received anti-corruption training | % | 100 | This total accounts for the JGSHI employees who took the 2024 Business Conduct and Ethics E-learning Refresher Course, which includes the Anti-Bribery and Anti-Corruption Policy. |
The Board of Directors, with the exception of Mr. James L. Go as he is granted permanent exemption from attending Corporate Governance trainings, attended the SEC-accredited Corporate Governance training.
The SEC-accredited Corporate Governance training included a session on the Anti-Money Laundering Act entitled “Unraveling the Link: Corruption and Money Laundering”.
Incidents of Corruption
Disclosure | Unit | Quantity | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
Number of incidents in which directors were removed or disciplined for corruption | # | 0 | URC, RLC, CEB, JGSOC, JGSHI-CCU |
Number of incidents in which employees were dismissed or disciplined for corruption | # | 0 | |
Number of incidents when contracts with business partners were terminated due to incidents of corruption | # | 0 |
Customer Management
Customer Satisfaction
Disclosure | Score | Did a third party conduct the customer satisfaction study (Y/N)? |
2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
Customer Satisfaction | +28 | N | CEB33 |
Rank 8 | Y | URC34 | |
70% | N | RLC35 |
Net Promoter Score (Post-Flight)
URC participated in the Advantage Report, which shows the performance of suppliers as evaluated by retailers. In 2024, URC BCF Philippines is part of the top 10 evaluated suppliers, ranking 8th overall among its peers. The survey covers both local and international companies in the consumer goods space. URC defines its customers as the trade (key accounts & distributors).
Customer Satisfaction Score. General Note: For 2025, we will be transitioning to NPS (Net Promoter Score) which is correlated to the CSAT Score, for our measure of customer satisfaction.
Health and Safety
Disclosure | Unit | Quantity | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
No. of substantiated complaints on product or service health and safety* | # | 106 | CEB |
1,909 | RLC36 | ||
0 | URC37 | ||
No. of complaints addressed | # | 106 | CEB |
1,909 | RLC38 | ||
0 | URC39 |
*Substantiated complaints include complaints from customers that went through the organization’s formal communication channels and grievance mechanisms as well as complaints that were lodged to and acted upon by government agencies.
RLC data covers Malls and Residences
URC information includes data from BCF-PH only
RLC data covers Malls and Residences
URC information includes data from BCF-PH only
Marketing and Labelling
Disclosure | Unit | Quantity | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
No. of substantiated complaints on marketing and labelling* | # | 14 | CEB |
0 | URC40 | ||
No. of complaints addressed | # | 14 | CEB |
0 | URC41 |
*Substantiated complaints include complaints from customers that went through the organization’s formal communication channels and grievance mechanisms as well as complaints that were lodged to and acted upon by government agencies.
URC data from BCF-PH only
URC data from BCF-PH only
Customer Privacy
Disclosure | Unit | Quantity | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
No. of substantiated complaints on customer privacy* | # | 0 | URC42, RLC, CEB |
No. of complaints addressed | # | 0 | |
No. of customers, users, and account holders whose information are used for secondary purposes | # | 0 |
*Substantiated complaints include complaints from customers that went through the organization’s formal communication channels and grievance mechanisms, as well as complaints that were lodged to and acted upon by government agencies.
URC’s customers are defined as key accounts and exclusive distributors. URC will ensure that the account management process handles account/customer information with strict confidentiality.
Data Security
Disclosure | Unit | Quantity | 2024 Boundaries |
---|---|---|---|
No. of data breaches, including leaks, thefts and losses of data | # | 1 | RLC |
JGSHI implements cyber-security capability increase and preventive measures to ensure the security of confidential company data. As of to date, the Data Privacy Policy and Information Security (InfoSec) Policies applicable to the whole conglomerate are in place.
The Company established the Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) Policies that institutionalized information security as part of the Conglomerate’s enterprise risk management, protect the Company’s information assets and reputation, and to comply with relevant laws and regulations.
The ISMS consists of the following:
- Core Information Security Policies drive the primary objectives of the ISMS: establish, maintain, and improve information security.
- Information Security Policy aims to establish, maintain, and continuously improve the ISMS to protect information assets, maintaining competitive advantage and increasing stakeholders’ confidence.
- Information Asset Management Policy aims to define and classify information assets in both physical and electronic formats and provide guidance on how to appropriately handle information assets according to classification.
- Information Security Incident Management Policy aims to mandate a structured approach in managing incidents that compromise corporate information and personal data of the business units’ customers.
- Compliance Policy aims to ensure that Business Units comply with applicable legal, regulatory requirements and contractual obligations, when conducting business activities.
- Organizational Policies aim to establish Information Security organization, roles and responsibilities as well as accountability of those who have access to corporate information.
- Information Security Internal Organization Policy aims to establish the appropriate internal organization that ensure security of information assets.
- Human Resource Security Policy aims to protect the company’s business interests by ensuring that employees and contractors understand and fulfill their roles and responsibilities to preserve information security before, during, and after employment.
- Supplier Relations Policy aims to mandate controls that protect information assets exposed to suppliers and preserve the integrity of supplier selection activities.
- Access and Use Policies enforce controls for access and authorization, as well as acceptable use of information assets.
- Access Control Policy aims to implement adequate measures to regulate access to different information assets and facilities, ensuring that facilities and equipment are only accessed by authorized personnel.
- Acceptable Use of Assets Policy aims to ensure that employees understand how corporate assets should and should not be used, ensuring that the BU gets the most value out of its corporate assets and networks to avoid unintended security breaches.
- Physical and Environmental Security Policy aims to protect corporate assets and information by mandating controls that prevent unauthorized physical access to company premises, as well as equipment that support business operations.
- Mobile Device and Teleworking Policy aims to establish rules for the use, management and security of all mobile devices that process company information and establish rules for conducting official business outside the work premises.
- Operational Security Policies refer to the implementation of technical controls to maintain the target level of security.
- Cryptographic Controls Policy aims to apply cryptographic controls (i.e. encryption) on confidential electronic information (e.g. files, databases), to add another layer of protection and prevent unauthorized use or disclosure.
- Operations Security Policy aims to apply appropriate controls to ensure that day-to-day operations are carried out in a controlled and a secure manner.
- Communications Security Policy aims to implement measures that will protect information as it moves both within the corporate network and outward.
- Data Security Policy aims to implement measures to protect corporate information from possible loss and leakage, avoiding breaches to legal, statutory or contractual obligations.
- Secure Development Policy aims to protect corporate information and minimize breaches by ensuring that information security is taken into consideration when developing or acquiring systems and services.
Regular and ad hoc exercises ensure the relevant teams practice cyber incident response and breach management procedures.
A 24/7 Security Operations Center was established in January 2020 to continuously monitor JGSHI’ information assets and help protect the enterprise security baseline.
Corporate IT Audit conducts year-on-year assessments on JGSHI Information Security Office’s programs and activities ensuring alignment to corporate policies, statutory and regulatory requirements, and enterprise risk management.
Biodiversity
Habitats Protected or Restored
Universal Robina Corporation

Area: Five (5) Hectares
CEB has partnered with the Ramon Aboitiz Foundation Inc. One to Tree program (RAFI OTT) to support the conservation and restoration of mangroves in Cebu. CEB and RAFI are jointly enhancing a mangrove plantation in Barangay Tapon, Dumanjug, Cebu. The 10,000 mangrove seedlings were planted across an estimated five (5) hectares of mangrove area. A people’s organization, the Tapon Fisherfolks Association were engaged for seedling production, site preparation, actual planting, maintenance, and monitoring for eight (8) quarters. Survival rate as of 2024 is at least 90%.
Area: N/A
The Philippines has more than 1,000 flora and fauna listed as threatened species. It will take collective action from various stakeholders including the government, local and international non-governmental organizations, and local communities to provide innovative solutions and efforts to continue to protect and conserve wildlife for sustainability and for resilient biodiversity.
In response to the call to action of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Biodiversity Management Bureau (BMB) for Wildlife Conservation, Cebu Pacific signed a Memorandum of Agreement to transport threatened wild fauna back to their natural habitat to ensure their survival. The MOA took effect in August 2022 and will be valid until August 2025.
Area: N/A
The Philippine Eagle is a highly endangered species, with only less than 400 pairs remaining in the wild. CEB supported the Philippine Eagle Center in Davao City from 2015-2023. For almost a decade, CEB has been committed in its support for ‘Mindanao’, providing essential resources such as food, shelter maintenance, keeper care, and veterinary services for the facility's captive-bred eagle.
Universal Robina Corporation

Area: 1.8 ha (with the possibility of increasing land area)
JGSOC, in partnership with DENR-EMB, rehabilitated and restored Boracay Wetland No. 8, a 1.8-hectare swamp and marshland located in Brgy. Manocmanoc, Boracay Island, which is home to 39 species of flora and 20 faunal species of birds, fishes, mammals, and gastropods. The initiative was launched in July 2019 and the MOA was renewed in November 2023, to restore the environmental sustainability of Wetland No. 8 and prevent further degradation of its ecosystem, espousing a private-public sector collaborative approach with the involvement of other stakeholder communities.
Area: 160 m2
The JGSOC Artificial Reef Project is located in a sandy area along the coastal zone of Barangay Simlong in Batangas City, near the JGSOC petrochemical complex. The artificial reefs function similarly to natural reefs, providing protection and habitat for a diverse range of marine life. Each artificial reef is a concrete block measuring approximately two (2) cubic feet. According to the latest monitoring survey of the faunal communities found at the sites, conducted last August 2024 by the Batangas Community Divers Seal, Inc. (BCDSI), there have been positive changes in marine biodiversity in the area, such as an increase in fish species and coral growth.
Area: ~640,000 seedlings (as of December 2024)
JGSOC’s “One Million Trees” initiative aims to plant one million indigenous and fruit-bearing tree seedlings within ten (10) years. The key programs under this initiative are tree planting and protection and maintenance of a two-hectare mini-forest with tree nursery, located at Brgy. Pinamucan Ibaba, Batangas City. As of December 2024, there are around 640,000 seedlings planted. The success of this initiative is made possible through partnerships with DENR, LGU, the host barangays, and with various NGOs and universities.
Universal Robina Corporation

Area: 11,376 seedlings
URC-wide tree planting and nurturing activities were conducted across different sites.
In support to the Expanded National Greening Program (NGP) stated in Executive Order 193, SURE URSUMCO and PASSI have signed MOA with DENR CENRO to Adopt-a-Forest of 3 Ha in Tanglad, Manjuyod, Negros Oriental and 5 Ha in San Enrique, Iloilo. This partnership will rehabilitate the forest/watershed identified by DENR through establishment of seedling and plantation nursery as well as conducting maintenance and protection activities in 3 years. In 2024, a total of 2,500 seedlings were planted through this program. In addition, ESMO continuously conducted activities in its commitment to the adopt-a-creek program in partnership with their respective LGUs and MENRO/CENRO.
In 2024, collaborative efforts with various stakeholders resulted in the successful planting of 11,376 seedlings, consisting of various endemic species of trees and mangroves, fostering environmental sustainability.
Operational Sites Affecting Biodiversity Protected Areas
Universal Robina Corporation

Batangas Bay is within a Key Biodiversity Area located in the Verde Island Passage.
The company has no operations affecting the habitats of species listed in the IUCN red list of threatened species and national conservation list species.
n/a
Universal Robina Corporation

CMC Davao Flour Mill located in Km 10 Sasa, Buhangin District, Davao City, Davao del Sur is situated on the gulf’s west coast. Davao City is among the four provinces that surrounds Davao Gulf which is listed by DENR-Biodiversity Management Bureau as Key Biodiversity Area.
Davao gulf situated in the southeastern part of Mindanao is one of the priority conservation areas of the Sulu-Sulawesi Marine Ecoregion. It is a breeding and nursery ground for small and large species, with frequent sightings of whale sharks, dugongs and leatherback turtles, among the list of species cited in the Convention on the International Trade of Endangered Species (Source: WWF).
The company has no operations affecting the habitats of species listed in IUCN17 Red list species and national conservation list species.
n/a
Supplier Accreditation
Execution of this policy is on a per SBU basis. JGSHI Corporate Procurement’s role is to consolidate the output from SBUs into a central supplier database and to provide the framework for policy development.

Click the image to view (6 pages)
2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results
Effective stakeholder engagement aids JG Summit to identify critical issues and concerns that could affect its long-term success. By actively engaging with stakeholders, we gain valuable insights into expectations, values, and potential risks from our partners as it fosters collaboration in addressing common challenges and contributes to meaningful, positive outcomes.
Ultimately, stakeholder engagement plays a crucial role in driving continuous improvement, aligning business practices with societal expectations, and promoting sustainable and ethical business practices.
Investors and Shareholders
- Financial growth and profitability
- Ethical standards for governance and business conduct
- Commitment and targets related to social and environmental responsibility especially on Climate Change
- Resilience and strategy against key business and sustainability risks
- Result briefings through Quarterly and Annual Reports
- Annual stockholder meetings
- Disclosures to the Philippine Stock Exchange and other pertinent agencies
- Meetings with investors
- Oversight of the Board through its Governance, Nomination, Remuneration and Sustainability Committee (GNRSC)
- Correspondence with ESG rating agencies (e.g., CDP, MSCI)
- Continuous development of business strategy to improve financial and operational performance
- Compliance with laws and regulations
- Adherence to good governance principles
- Incorporation of sustainability to business strategy
- Enhanced sustainability disclosure to include strategy to reach targets along with milestones
- Communication of received feedback to top management through Executive Leadership Council (ELC) meetings to further incorporate sustainability into business strategy
- Enhanced ERM policies, systems, and procedures
Employees
- Competitive compensation and benefits
- Frequent career conversations between employees and their managers
- Exposure to career advancement opportunities
- Positive work culture driven by purpose, values, and community
- Town hall meetings
- Open dialogues
- Pulse Employee Engagement Survey
- Continuous benchmarking to ensure up-to-date provision of competitive salaries, benefits, and employee growth initiatives such as formal training and e-training
- Strong partnership between HR and leadership on employees' performance management and development
- Setting of town hall meetings and other avenues for employee communication
- Adherence to good labor practices and workplace standards
- Purpose and values-driven initiatives to strengthen group identity, engagement, and community
Suppliers and Service Providers
- Lasting business commitments
- Complying to sustainability policies of JGSHI
- Timely payment
- Vendor audits
- Open line communication
- Execution of purchasing ethics, strategic purchasing, and supplier relationship management
- Strict implementation of Supplier Accreditation Policy
- Practice of due diligence in processing liabilities
Regulators and Government Bodies
- Legal compliance with laws and regulations
- Comments and improvements on legislative proposals
- Partnership in social and environmental responsibility
- Feedback and suggestions on existing policies, laws and regulations affecting our other stakeholders
- Annual and Sustainability Reports
- Statement of compliance
- Licenses to operate
- Position Papers
- Corporate social responsibility programs
- Association and/or community engagement with discussion regarding policies, laws, and regulations affecting the association members and/or communities
- Compliance with laws and regulations
- Submission of official position papers on legislative proposals
- Implementation of initiatives to support government programs (e.g., Lingkod Pinoy Centers and tree planting)
- Drafting and submission of feedback and suggestions for and on behalf of the Association and/or community
Communities
- Community engagement and development
- Responsible environmental management
- Corporate social responsibility programs
- Environmental compliance programs
- Continuous development and design of projects and programs that respond to community needs
- Compliance with environmental standards
Customers of SBUs
- Product quality
- Health and safety
- Marketing and labelling
- Data privacy
- Open communication channels
- Customer Satisfaction Survey
- Quality assurance for products and services of each SBU
- Implementation of environmental, safety, and quality standards and assurance systems
- Proper marketing and labelling for product content, usage, and service inclusions
- Enhanced JGSHI-wide information security system to prevent any data leak and security breach
Annex B. Philippine SEC Sustainability Reporting for Publicly Listed Companies Content Index
Annex C. IFRS (S1 and S2) Sustainability Disclosure Standards Content Index
Filler | Climate Disclosure | Section |
---|---|---|
Governance | a. Board’s oversight of sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Governance Framework, Composition, Sustainability and Climate |
b. Management’s role in assessing and managing sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Governance Framework, Enterprise Risk Management, Sustainability and Climate | |
Risk Management | a. Processes and related policies the entity uses to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor sustainability and climate-related risks | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Enterprise Risk Management |
b. Processes used to identify, assess, prioritize, and monitor sustainability and climate-related opportunities | Sustainability and Climate Risk and Opportunity Management Framework | |
c. Processes for identifying, assessing, and managing sustainability and climate-related risks that are integrated into the organization’s overall risk management | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Enterprise Risk Management | |
Strategy | a. Sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities the organization has identified | Sustainability at JGSHI, Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Strategy, Metrics, and Targets, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results |
b. Impact of sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities on the organization’s businesses, strategy, and financial planning | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Strategy, Metrics, and Targets, Our Impact, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results | |
c. Resilience of the organization’s strategy, taking into consideration different sustainability and climate-related scenarios | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Strategy, Metrics, and Targets, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results, Our Approach to Managing Climate Risks | |
Metrics and Targets | a. Metrics used by the organization to assess sustainability and climate-related risks and opportunities in line with its strategy and risk management process | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Strategy, Metrics, and Targets |
b. Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and the related risks | EESG Performance Indices – GHG Emissions, Air Pollutants | |
c. Targets used by the organization to manage climate-related risks and opportunities and performance against targets | Evolving Our Approach to Sustainability – Strategy, Metrics, and Targets, Our Impact |
Annex D. GRI Content Index
Statement of use
JG Summit Holdings, Inc. has reported the information cited in this GRI content index for the period January 1 to December 31, 2024 with reference to the GRI Standards.
GRI 1 used
GRI 1: Foundation 2021
GRI Standard | Disclosure | Section or Direct Answer |
---|---|---|
GRI 2: General Disclosures 2021 | 2-1 Organizational details | Our Company |
2-2 Entities included in the organization’s sustainability reporting | Corporate Structure, Strategic Business Units | |
2-3 Reporting period, frequency and contact point | January 1–December 31, 2024, Corporate Directory | |
2-4 Restatements of information | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
2-5 External assurance | No external assurance | |
2-7 Employees | EESG Performance Indices – Employee Data | |
2-9 Governance structure and composition | Corporate Governance | |
2-10 Nomination and selection of the highest governance body | The Board of Directors, Governance Programs | |
2-11 Chair of the highest governance body | The Board of Directors | |
2-12 Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts | Corporate Governance, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results | |
2-13 Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | Corporate Governance | |
2-14 Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting | Governance Framework, Board Composition | |
2-15 Conflicts of interest | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Compliance Monitoring and Implementation | |
2-16 Communication of critical concerns | Compliance Monitoring and Implementation | |
2-17 Collective knowledge of the highest governance body | Board Competencies, Board Trainings | |
2-18 Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body | Board Performance Assessment | |
2-19 Remuneration policies | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Remuneration | |
2-20 Process to determine remuneration | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Remuneration | |
2-21 Annual total compensation ratio | Composition and Qualification, Remuneration | |
2-22 Statement on sustainable development strategy | Sustainability at JGSHI, Strategy, Metrics, and Targets | |
2-23 Policy commitments | Corporate Governance Policies, Labor Management Relations, EESG Performance Indices - Governance, Supplier Accreditation | |
2-24 Embedding policy commitments | Corporate Governance Policies, Labor Management Relations, EESG Performance Indices - Governance, Supplier Accreditation | |
2-25 Processes to remediate negative impacts | Compliance Monitoring and Implementation, Employee Training and Development | |
2-26 Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns | Compliance Monitoring and Implementation, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results | |
2-27 Compliance with laws and regulations | Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Internal Controls, Governance Programs, URC’s Extended Producer Responsibility Strategy, Non-compliance with Environmental Laws and Regulations, Labor Management Relations | |
2-28 Membership associations | JGSHI is a member of Makati Business Club (MBC), which is a private, non-profit business association in the Philippines. Established in 1981, MBC represents the interests of the country’s largest and most prominent businesses, including major corporations and conglomerates. It serves as a forum for discussion on economic, political, and social issues affecting the business environment in the Philippines. MBC engages in policy advocacy, publishes research, and reports, and facilitates dialogues between the private sector and government. The organization aims to promote good governance, transparency, and sustainable economic development in the country. It is also involved in various initiatives that support business growth, social responsibility, and national competitiveness. JGSHI is also a member of the Philippine Alliance for Recycling and Materials Sustainability (PARMS), which is a non-profit, multi-stakeholder coalition that promotes recycling and materials sustainability in the Philippines. Established in 2014, PARMS brings together various sectors, including businesses, government agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), academic institutions, and communities, to collaborate on solutions for waste management and environmental sustainability. The alliance aims to address the country's growing waste problem through initiatives such as developing sustainable packaging solutions, promoting recycling practices, and advocating for policies that support a circular economy. PARMS focuses on educating the public, raising awareness about the importance of responsible waste management, and supporting innovations in recycling and sustainable materials use. PARMS is known for its commitment to working towards zero waste and a more sustainable future by fostering partnerships among its members and stakeholders, which include some of the largest companies and organizations in the Philippines. |
|
2-29 Approach to stakeholder engagement | 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results | |
2-30 Collective bargaining agreements | Labor Management Relations | |
GRI 3: Material Topics 2021 | 3-1 Process to determine material topics | Strategy, Metrics, and Targets, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results |
3-2 List of material topics | Sustainability at JGSHI, Our Impact, 2024 Stakeholder Engagement Results | |
3-3 Management of material topics | Our Impact | |
GRI 201: Economic Performance 2016 | 201-1 Direct economic value generated and distributed | Our Impact – Shared Success, Sustainability Performance Scorecard |
201-2 Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change | Risk Categories – Climate Risk, Sustainability and Climate Risk and Opportunity Management Framework | |
GRI 202: Market Presence 2016 | 202-1 Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage | Employee Data |
GRI 204: Procurement Practices 2016 | 204-1 Proportion of spending on local suppliers | EESG Performance Indices – Procurement Practices |
GRI 205: Anti-corruption 2016 | 205-1 Operations assessed for risks related to corruption | Governance Programs, Risk Categories – Governance Risk |
205-2 Communication and training about anti-corruption policies and procedures | Board Trainings, EESG Performance Indices – Governance | |
205-3 Confirmed incidents of corruption and actions taken | EESG Performance Indices – Governance | |
GRI 301: Materials 2016 | 301-1 Materials used by weight or volume | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance |
301-2 Recycled input materials used | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
GRI 302: Energy 2016 | 302-1 Energy consumption within the organization | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance |
302-3 Energy intensity | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
302-4 Reduction of energy consumption | Our Impact – Climate Action, EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
GRI 303: Water and Effluents 2018 | 303-1 Interactions with water as a shared resource | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance |
303-2 Management of water discharge-related impacts | Our Impact – Resource Efficiency and Circularity, EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
303-3 Water withdrawal | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
303-4 Water discharge | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
303-5 Water consumption | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
GRI 304: Biodiversity 2016 | 304-1 Operational sites owned, leased, managed in, or adjacent to, protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value outside protected areas | EESG Performance Indices – Biodiversity |
304-2 Significant impacts of activities, products and services on biodiversity | EESG Performance Indices – Biodiversity | |
304-3 Habitats protected or restored | EESG Performance Indices – Biodiversity | |
304-4 IUCN Red List species and national conservation list species with habitats in areas affected by operations | EESG Performance Indices – Biodiversity | |
GRI 305: Emissions 2016 | 305-1 Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance |
305-2 Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
305-3 Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
305-4 GHG emissions intensity | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
305-5 Reduction of GHG emissions | Our Impact – Climate Action, EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
305-6 Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
305-7 Nitrogen oxides (NOx, sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significant air emissions | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
GRI 306: Waste 2020 | 306-1 Waste generation and significant waste-related impacts | Our Impact – Resource Efficiency and Circularity |
306-2 Management of significant waste-related impacts | Our Impact – Resource Efficiency and Circularity | |
306-3 Waste generated | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
306-4 Waste diverted from disposal | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
306-5 Waste directed to disposal | EESG Performance Indices – Environmental Performance | |
GRI 401: Employment 2016 | 401-1 New employee hires and employee turnover | EESG Performance Indices – Social |
401-2 Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part-time employees | EESG Performance Indices – Social | |
401-3 Parental leave | EESG Performance Indices – Social | |
GRI 403: Occupational Health and Safety 2018 | 403-1 Occupational health and safety management system | EESG Performance Indices – Social, Our Impact – Employee Growth and Well-Being |
403-2 Hazard identification, risk assessment, and incident investigation | Enterprise Risk Management and Internal Controls | |
403-3 Occupational health services | Duties to Stakeholders – Employees | |
403-5 Worker training on occupational health and safety | Our Impact – Employee Growth and Well-Being | |
403-6 Promotion of worker health | Duties to Stakeholders – Employees, Risk Categories – People Risk, Our Impact – Shared Succes, Our Impact – Employee Growth and Well-Being, Our Impact – Employee Growth and Well-Being, EESG Performance Indices – Social | |
403-9 Work-related injuries | EESG Performance Indices – Social | |
403-10 Work-related ill health | EESG Performance Indices – Social | |
GRI 404: Training and Education 2016 | 404-1 Average hours of training per year per employee | EESG Performance Indices – Social |
404-2 Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs | Our Impact – Better Choices, Our Impact – Employee Growth and Well-Being, EESG Performance Indices – Social | |
GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity 2016 | 405-1 Diversity of governance bodies and employees | Corporate Governance Policies, Board Diversity, EESG Performance Indices – Social |
GRI 407: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining 2016 | 407-1 Operations and suppliers in which the right to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk | EESG Performance Indices – Social, EESG Performance Indices – Governance |
GRI 408: Child Labor 2016 | 408-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor | EESG Performance Indices – Social |
GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labor 2016 | 409-1 Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor | EESG Performance Indices – Social |
GRI 413: Local Communities 2016 | 413-1 Operations with local community engagement, impact assessments, and development programs | Our Impact – Shared Success, EESG Performance Indices – Biodiversity |
413-2 Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | Our Impact – Shared Success, EESG Performance Indices – Biodiversity | |
GRI 416: Customer Health and Safety 2016 | 416-2 Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services |
EESG Performance Indices – Governance URC Food Safety and Quality Management Commitment URC is dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of Quality and Food Safety throughout all facets of its operations. This commitment is aligned with the latest global standards and adheres to internal policies and procedures, ensuring that products meet the expectations of the company’s consumers and stakeholders. To reinforce this commitment, URC is continuously enhancing its initiatives, notably through the implementation of the One GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) Requirements and the URC Operational Requirements (URCORe) Integrated Quality and Food Safety Standards. URCORe serves as a comprehensive framework for establishing management systems ensuring business continuity through rigorous standards governance, thorough documentation support, and a centralized platform for accessing the Operational Requirements across all URC operations. The organization’s Global Quality and Food Safety Team has made significant strides in evolving systems to further enhance quality and food safety through the following initiatives:
--------------------------------------------------------------- Passenger safety remains the priority of CEB. The Group continues to implement strict safety measures designed to reassure travelers and protect the public from unnecessary dangers. The measures taken by the Group to ensure occupational and aviation safety, described earlier under the Workplace Conditions topic, result in a safer environment for its customers. Apart from mitigating the risks posed by wildlife and bird strikes, Cebu Pacific also ensures its employees are well-trained to handle emergency situations such as fire and earthquakes and maintains their mental and physical well-being to handle customers and carry out their duties properly. CEB has maintained air safety certification by IATA through the Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) program. The Group’s operations are subject to continuous audits and surveillance programs by civil aviation authorities. All health and safety-related matters are discussed in the monthly ASRC meetings, as described in the relevant section above under Governance. Source: CEB SEC Form 17A, Conso FS and Sustainability Report_December 31, 2024, p.261 --------------------------------------------------------------- From the design and construction of properties to their operation, RLC takes measures to reduce health and safety risks to both employees and customers. Structural threats are minimized by meeting the highest building standards, and risks of slippage and fall are regularly assessed and audited. Source: RLC_SEC 17-A_December 31 2024, p. 150 |
GRI 417: Marketing and Labeling 2016 | 417-3 Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications |
EESG Performance Indices – Governance URC adheres closely to the Philippine Food Safety Act (Republic Act or R.A. 10611) which protects consumer health and safety. Regulatory compliance encompasses product registration, sale, inspection, labeling, and marketing. URC ensures full compliance with regulatory labeling and product information requirements, implementing the necessary analysis for nutritional facts and claims. ![]() ![]() Source: URC SEC 17A Form Dec 31 2024, pp. 234-235 --------------------------------------------------------------- CEB continues to proactively address the needs of its customers through appropriate marketing communications. It also adheres to the Ad Standards Council (ASC) and Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) regulations in the Philippines to ensure commitment to advertising responsibly and upholding the highest standards of ethics. Source: CEB SEC Form 17A, Conso FS and Sustainability Report_December 31, 2024, p.261 |
GRI 418: Customer Privacy 2016 | 418-1 Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data | EESG Performance Indices – Governance |